The eyeglasses start-up Warby Parker is valued at +$100M only one year after founding because 1) it fits the classic definition of a disruptive company and 2) is an innovative company playing in a large market with unsophisticated competitors.

If you wear eyeglasses, you're aware that a good pair of eyeglasses are hard to buy. At an optical store, designer frames with nice lenses will run you over $500 a pair. Virtually nothing is less than $200 and anything in the $200-500 range looks like they've been selling that same style for the last decade. Furthermore, you're going to be choosing from the same frames as any person who lives in your area. 

This is a market where sales channels are fragmented and undifferentiated. The product being sold is either the equivalent of the "CVS store brand" or has the prices inflated two-fold. Brick-and-mortar stores are expensive to maintain, inevitably adding a lot to the price of every product, but bring little value to the customer, except the ability to try on glasses.

This market was just waiting for someone new and good to come into the game. This is a broken system.

The obvious innovation is to take the sales channel online, which brings down the cost of the product and increases selection. Virtually every consumer product has seen challengers do that, from DVD rentals (Netflix) to toilet paper (Amazon Subscribe & Save). The other crucial problem is that the product design is dated and stale, which allows designer brands to take a fat margin simply for not being horrible. So the second innovation is that you need to vertically integrate the supply chain and sell your own product through your new online sales channel.

But with these two basic problems addressed, where do retailers still naturally have an advantage over an online store?

1) They let you try on glasses 
2) They have salespeople who, theoretically, can help you
3) They could (but don't) sell toward a specific style and build a brand geared toward that type of customer taste, the way clothing stores specialize by age, gender, and lifestyle (for example, Ann Taylor vs. Urban Outfitters)

An online eyeglass store that has something better than the "CVS brand" product AND can compete with retailers on the three fronts above will naturally blow competition out of the water. 
 
Price: All eyeglasses are $95, come with excellent lenses, free two-day shipping and free 30-day returns. 

Warby Parker prices undercut the competition by 5x. Furthermore, it chose a transparent and simple pricing system that cuts down on indecision.

Product and Brand: It uses in-house designs and built its own manufacturing supply chain, so doesn't depend on existing products. It created a collection that is trendy, with a look that is urban, a little hipster, and meant to appeal to the under-40 crowd. 

It's created a product that is, to its target audience, far and away superior to what's already out there.  

Trying on the Product: They'll ship you up to 5 frames to try on at home and send back to them when you've decided. 2-day shipping, free both ways. If you live near a showroom, you can book an appointment to visit in person. There's also an addicting "virtual try-on" feature that automatically fits glasses to a picture of you from your webcam or computer:
They've made it easy and free for customers to feel confident that they like the product before they commit to buy.

Customer Service: Warby Parker is one the many tech start-ups who recognize the importance of the Zappos customer service model. Their Yelp reviews show that their customer service is consistently available, helpful, knowledgeable, and nice. 

Their website tools, coupled with a strong customer service team, make their support better than many optical stores.

Warby Parker understood the business opportunity thoroughly, and is executing its business model with flair. The company was founded only a year ago, and is now being valued at +$100 MM

My analysis of their success makes it clear why I think they deserve to be VC darlings. They found a big consumer-facing industry with high prices and poor products where, because of fashion and style, the product will always resist being commoditized. This is a classic disruptive technology that will quickly be moving up-market. The question now is, how will Warby Parker ward off the competition?

Update: There is a great discussion about this post at Hacker News 
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4208222
a
 


Comments

07/06/2012 14:18

It would appear they're trying to stop their competition with cease and desist letters! (See Classic Specs) That said, having competitors is validation of your space. They have almost an exact knock off in Mezzmer. I can't walk down the street without seeing at least two people sporting Warby Parker specs.

Reply
07/06/2012 18:56

It really is a perfect example of a business that said "hey, let's shake up a boring industry with a new model." I am looking for a new pair of glasses and am 99% sure I'll buy through Warby Parker -- the only other place I might consider is Costco

Reply
10/24/2012 11:35

Warby Parker is very strong New York City-based startup. I like their vintage stylish glasses.

Reply

Your article is very informative. I've found out many new interesting facts. Thanks for sharing. It's so nice of you.

Reply



Leave a Reply